Wednesday 21 October 2009

Is the Pope Catholic?

A reasonable question, I think, given the announcement of special provision for Anglicans who want to convert to Rome while preserving aspects of Anglican liturgy (although obviously toungue-in-cheek).

This is, of course, being reported as something that the Catholic Church is doing, but I think that is the wrong perspective. It is now (I think) 17 years since the Anglican church decided to admit women clergy, and those outside the Church are just beginning to notice the more subtle effects of that step (i.e. the effects other than the slightly greater likelihood that an Anglican priest will have an effeminate air...). That step took place just a few years after I switched from Catholicism to Anglicanism, welcomed in by by a receptive local church and supported by the firmly Anglican family whose daughter I had fallen for. At the time, it seemed to me to strike a discordant note; the Anglicanism that I had thus far encountered was in line with the Catholic doctrines that I had learnt (the distinction between Catholicism and Roman Catholicism was eagerly pointed out to me), so my new Church had seemed to be merely a somewhat more tolerant version of what I was used to. I confess that I did not then understand why the change was being made.

Since then, I have learnt that the Anglicanism I met was in fact one end of the spectrum. Various changes of house and job took me to different areas of the country, and to different parishes where a different flavour of Anglicanism was offered. I do miss what might be called the "high point" of my experience of Anglicanism; it now seems impossible to find in any of the churches local to me.

And there, I think, lies the real significance of that decision 17 years ago. It was a decision taken by one wing of the Church with the full knowledge that it offended the firmly held beliefs of another wing. That victory - and it was nothing less - gave that wing a confidence. Since then, the Anglican Church has (from my observation) moved from an assumption that all views within it are valid to an assumption that tradition and reverence are unnecessary - and that the evangelical, happy-clappy, arms in the air, close your eyes and feel God in the room approach to a Sunday service is the only correct one.

My opinion on the subject will be obvious from the words that I have chosen to describe the change. But that is not the point; I do not criticise Evangelicals because I think they are wrong. If they find that form of service uplifting and inspiring, then I am pleased that they wish to worship and am happy for them to do so in that way. My criticism is that they seem to think that I am wrong because I disagree, because I don't want to stand up in the middle of the Mass and shout out how God touched me this week.

So this is not actually about women priests. It is about tolerance; a tolerance of other views that used to exist in the Anglican Church but which does no longer. Women priests were merely the "Clause 4" moment that gave licence to henceforth ignore the traditionalists.

This, like all good sermons, leads neatly to the closing homily. If an organisation wishes to change its nature, then it must be free to do so. But those that drive the change forward must not be surprised if they leave a sizeable chunk of people behind.

5 comments:

  1. I love the fact that within the Church of England there is a huge range of traditions. I remember at our "home" church a new vicar came in and started some new traditions which were a bit "high church" for us. The family had long discussions about whether we should say something or even find a new church. What we considered a bit "high" was, to some neighbours, remarkably spartan compared with the church they went to a few minutes walk away.

    I hate going to churches which are not the ones I am used to. And I am not even into religion particularly.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes, I think this is astute (provided you're not conflating the Evangelicals and the Liberals in the CofE).

    My loathing of liberalism was honed in the CofE before I became a Catholic (thanks be to God). The CofE is in many ways a microcosm of New Labour. It is where liberalism is at its most self-righteously intolerant and exclusive. They seek to include by excluding those who who cannot in conscience sign up to this week's liberal orthodoxy (and oxymoron in theory but not in practice).

    A Cofe report has told them that faithful Anglicans are slowly being kicked out by intolerant liberalism, but they have pressed ahead with precisely the kinds of resolutions they have been told will unchurch their brothers and sisters. The result: many faithful Anglicans have felt the need to re-evaluate where they should be, and have come to see the need to be reconciled with the Holy Father.

    Yesterday's news was great and entirely unexpected. I am sure that Anglicans, who respond will find, as I did, that though the Catholic Church is much more disciplined than the CofE it is in fact far, far more generous.

    But more to the point, they will find as I have done, the fullness of the presence of Christ in the Catholic Church. Bravo Holy Father!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Blue - Horses for course, I think. The best solution seems to be a range of churches with different approaches, but the CofE seems to be creating local monopolies under the name of efficiency.

    Albert - I do hope I have not conflated the Evangelicals and the Liberals. I find the many labels hard to follow. Which one is the proper successor to the Peoples' Front of Judea?

    I am confused by people's desire to confuse discipline with intolerance. The two are entirely different. How can you love the sinner and hate the sin, if you do not have both the discipline and rigour necessary to identify the sin, and the tolerance necessary to forgive the sinner?

    A Cofe report has told them that faithful Anglicans are slowly being kicked out by intolerant liberalism

    Count me as one of those...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well if a cradle Catholic finds himself being kicked out of the CofE by intolerant liberalism, he will know what to do about it...! ;-D

    ReplyDelete
  5. it now seems impossible to find in any of the churches local to me.

    I'm very sorry, but not entirely surprised, to hear that, Mr. P.

    The CofE is in many ways a microcosm of New Labour. It is where liberalism is at its most self-righteously intolerant and exclusive. They seek to include by excluding those who who cannot in conscience sign up to this week's liberal orthodoxy.

    Albert is quite correct. But it is not just the CofE. Most mainline protestant denominations in the UK (and in many other western countries)are exactly the same.

    (p.s. sorry to come in late, but I've been away.)

    ReplyDelete